26 Mar
8

Post Title / Language Takes its Toll on Leadership

Posted by on in Resources. 8 Comments

language and leadershipWithin the history of mankind most would point to the emergence of language as the event that gives humanity its dignity and indeed its lofty position on the evolutionary tree. It is obvious that as human history has advanced, language has come to be the central focus of all activity. In the new digital world in which we all live, the refrain is often heard “content is king.” What do you suppose is the basic building block of all content? Why of course, language.

But as in all things held in a state of adulation, often times there is the proverbial “other side of the coin.” It is here that we might want to pay attention to our good friend, language.

In our previous discussions we have spoken about such things as concept, belief, ego, and the assumptive state from which arises conditioning and reactivity. All of this of course, is wrapped up in our own unconsciousness creating a state of separation. Now, all of these things are not bad in and of themselves. But, it is the stubborn belief or identification to each of these things as though they were real that creates an outcome of misery and bondage. Within the developmental approach to leadership, this glue of identification is what holds us in a reactive state and forces all leaders to attempt to manage that which is unmanageable.

So what does language have to do with all of this? If you look carefully, the function of language is principally to establish a connective pathway between two separate speakers. And within this connective pathway there is no doubt that an amazing level of efficiency arises that we all depend on for productive output. But is there a byproduct of this constant stance within the functioning of language? The answer to this, I believe is “yes”.

Language you see, is based on the idea that the world is constituted of subjects and objects. Each word has its role within the system. Due to the fact that we cannot communicate in single finished ideas, we are reduced to building concepts one word at a time. Within this structure, every idea is constantly changed by the addition of each new word. The very basis of language is rooted in the sense that understanding can be developed through the utilization of separate pieces and parts. And within the separate pieces and parts lives the notions of “you” and “I”. Through the usage of all these separate pieces, the terms that most often appear within language are that of “you” and “I”.

So what is the toll exacted by the system of separate construction? It is the energetic imprint that every time a “you” or and “I” is pronounced we mentally assign it to a separate object that we assume to be the fullness of who we are. For, as human beings, we have taken words that otherwise might be dead symbols on a screen or a page and breathed into them our life energy. In so doing, we have never considered the idea that the way that language separates you and I into separate buckets might contribute to the sense that we are indeed separate from all else around us.

Now this is a difficult concept for many to entertain. But let me give you one little exercise that might begin to shed light on how language creates our reality: For the next few days as you listen and speak, begin to notice how often the term “you” or “I” is utilized. As you notice the use of each of these terms, look inside and see, does this usage create a sense within you? By simply noticing that we impose self-separation through the use of our own language we become aware that this is happening on its own. And it is this awareness in the development of adult leaders that gives us a doorway to a new freedom – the seeing of ourselves as separate placeholders for the functioning of leadership rather than the absolute identification of ourselves as a separate object.

So tell me, what are your thoughts on this idea of language? How does it effect your leadership? I welcome comments below.

 

  • Chris

    Yo, Alan. . .right on to the role of language in our illusions of separation. . .just started a book called The Information by James Gleick. . .in it he posits that the ultimate building block of existence is the ‘bit’, the smallest iota of information and that that digital view is fast transforming our cosmology. . .whether it is or not, here we are again attempting to reduce existence down to something we can use to measure the immeasurable. . .everyday I get a little more fed up with all the melodrama laying atop reality. . .peace – T *

  • Chris

    Yo, Alan. . .right on to the role of language in our illusions of separation. . .just started a book called The Information by James Gleick. . .in it he posits that the ultimate building block of existence is the ‘bit’, the smallest iota of information and that that digital view is fast transforming our cosmology. . .whether it is or not, here we are again attempting to reduce existence down to something we can use to measure the immeasurable. . .everyday I get a little more fed up with all the melodrama laying atop reality. . .peace – T *

  • Erikmazziotta

    So there is no “I”. Yet our 3 dimensional consciousness seems to require an “I”. In playing with your exercise what comes up for me is the notion of a “functional I” which indeed is about identification, ownership and coordination in our 3D realm. And then there is a “habitual I” which is about pointing to me as an frame of reference with a bag of opinions, judgments and attention getting….sometimes in gross, sometimes in very subtle ways. There is a simplicity and truthfulness of the “functional I” arising from the silent aliveness of all that is.

  • Erikmazziotta

    So there is no “I”. Yet our 3 dimensional consciousness seems to require an “I”. In playing with your exercise what comes up for me is the notion of a “functional I” which indeed is about identification, ownership and coordination in our 3D realm. And then there is a “habitual I” which is about pointing to me as an frame of reference with a bag of opinions, judgments and attention getting….sometimes in gross, sometimes in very subtle ways. There is a simplicity and truthfulness of the “functional I” arising from the silent aliveness of all that is.

  • Ben

    Hi Alan,

    Excellent Post and I appreciate the activity. As you have pointed out language is the building block of concepts. When I use words or concepts in describing something, there is an assumption at work that we are talking about the same things, but actually in many cases we find out down the road that we have different definitions and descriptions.

    So, linking back to your previous post, the holistic view here is similar to what I think you mean by “holding space”. When strong thoughts, concepts, emotions, or sensations arise (and I remember) I take a short moment and relax body and thought. This reveals awareness or the fundamental openness that is the ground of our being. From this open intelligent space something new can arise.

    This intelligence spontaneously responds on its own in unpredictable ways. Also, the dynamic energy that arises out of this awareness creates in a way that cannot be captured by words or mathematical symbols if I am honest.

    I can allow this body and mind to be moved for benefit from the open spaciousness for service.

    That is what I am learning.

    And yes the underlying “i” thought and its stream can and does cloud the scene with its points of views, descriptions, and conditioning. So, it is important in my case to commit or give myself to this openness and allow what arises. This can be scary to the “i” thought, but it just needs to be seen not fixed. Then learning occurs and openness to new ways is possible beyond conditioning.

    All this occurs from taking a short moment whenever I remember to rest uncontrived in the spaciousness we are.

    Thanks for the post!

  • Ben

    Hi Alan,

    Excellent Post and I appreciate the activity. As you have pointed out language is the building block of concepts. When I use words or concepts in describing something, there is an assumption at work that we are talking about the same things, but actually in many cases we find out down the road that we have different definitions and descriptions.

    So, linking back to your previous post, the holistic view here is similar to what I think you mean by “holding space”. When strong thoughts, concepts, emotions, or sensations arise (and I remember) I take a short moment and relax body and thought. This reveals awareness or the fundamental openness that is the ground of our being. From this open intelligent space something new can arise.

    This intelligence spontaneously responds on its own in unpredictable ways. Also, the dynamic energy that arises out of this awareness creates in a way that cannot be captured by words or mathematical symbols if I am honest.

    I can allow this body and mind to be moved for benefit from the open spaciousness for service.

    That is what I am learning.

    And yes the underlying “i” thought and its stream can and does cloud the scene with its points of views, descriptions, and conditioning. So, it is important in my case to commit or give myself to this openness and allow what arises. This can be scary to the “i” thought, but it just needs to be seen not fixed. Then learning occurs and openness to new ways is possible beyond conditioning.

    All this occurs from taking a short moment whenever I remember to rest uncontrived in the spaciousness we are.

    Thanks for the post!

  • Alan Shelton

    Thanks for the comments. Sometimes what is hard to put into words, is the ‘felt experience’ of language. In the identified experience, each ‘I’ and ‘you’ seems to create an energetic structure as if each word is a brick in the descriptive container of identification. In expanded awareness each of these same communications are seen as happening to a small part of existence which is the placeholder called ‘me’. Phenomenally the same thing but experienced in an entirely different way. Bondage is simply the seemingly permanent experience of identification. When these two states toggle back and forth we call the aware moments “free samples” of awakening. In the coaching realm those free samples are the doorways to the next stage of the personal /impersonal journey.

  • Alan Shelton

    Thanks for the comments. Sometimes what is hard to put into words, is the ‘felt experience’ of language. In the identified experience, each ‘I’ and ‘you’ seems to create an energetic structure as if each word is a brick in the descriptive container of identification. In expanded awareness each of these same communications are seen as happening to a small part of existence which is the placeholder called ‘me’. Phenomenally the same thing but experienced in an entirely different way. Bondage is simply the seemingly permanent experience of identification. When these two states toggle back and forth we call the aware moments “free samples” of awakening. In the coaching realm those free samples are the doorways to the next stage of the personal /impersonal journey.